Big Walk Studio Discloses AI Use, Gets Disqualified From IGF Game of the Year

Australian indie developer House House has found itself at the center of a heated controversy after disclosing that it used generative AI tools during the making of Big Walk, its celebrated multiplayer puzzle game released in 2026. The studio said AI was used "sparingly" during the "final stretch of development" to address "difficult technical challenges," and characterized its impact as accounting for under 0.1% of the game's code. Despite the relatively small scale of the AI usage, the disclosure has had immediate consequences: Big Walk has been ruled ineligible for the Game of the Year award at the Independent Games Festival, scheduled for March 3, 2027.

The fallout has sparked a wider debate across the gaming community about transparency, AI ethics in indie development, and where the line should be drawn for festival eligibility. House House's statement came under pressure from the IGF voting controversy, suggesting the disclosure may not have been entirely voluntary. Critics argue that any undisclosed AI use, however minor, undermines the trust audiences and award bodies place in independent creators. Supporters of the studio counter that a fraction-of-a-percent contribution to code should not overshadow an otherwise human-crafted work. The situation has reignited long-simmering questions about whether the industry needs clearer, standardized rules around AI disclosure in game development.

Sources